With the imminent end of the UN's Mali peacekeeping mission seemingly no longer in doubt, negotiations at the UN are still foundering over the timetable for their departure, which Bamako wants...

New York author E. Jean Carroll, who in May won a landmark sexual assault trial against Donald Trump,

By Lisa Pauline Mattackal and Medha Singh For venture capitalists, the scars of bitcoin's disastrous 2022 run deep.

(Refiles to fix spelling of bloc in paragraph 3) By Yoruk Bahceli Futures contracts tied to bonds issued

'I feel like sh**ting on xQc has become this thing you do if you want to get likes, and I think it's cringe,' Asmongold said

Diego Balleza is a prominent 10-meter diver and is used to wearing small swimsuits that show off his body

Kadidiatou Diani might have feared she was going to miss the Women's World Cup when she suffered a fractured collarbone towards the end of last season, but the 28-year-old returned to fitness in time and has played a...

Protesters gather in Niamey after a West African bloc approve intervention against coup leaders.

'Getting involved with Kylie Jenner can lead to everything going up in flames,' a source close to Timothee Chalamet has claimed

A First Amendment group sued Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others on Thursday over the state’s TikTok ban on official devices

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not elaborate when he said that Israel would maintain indefinite “overall security responsibility” in Gaza once it removes Hamas from power in response to the Islamic militant group's cross-border raid

The office of Special Counsel Jack Smith has argued in a motion that there’s “no valid basis” for Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself after Donald Trump’s legal team argued that she should leave the case because of statements she made when sentencing January 6 rioters. “There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding,” the special counsel’s office wrote in a 20-page filing on Thursday. “In service of his motion (ECF No. 50) seeking the Court’s recusal, the defendant both takes out of context the Court’s words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals.” The special counsel added that Mr Trump “has failed to identify anything approaching the clear and convincing evidence necessary to overcome the presumption of impartiality”. The office argued that Mr Trump was using “suggestion and innuendo to insinuate something sinister in the Court simply doing its job by addressing sentencing arguments”. More follows...