Barcelona face Wolfsburg in the Champions League final on Saturday, aiming to assert themselves early as the decade's dominant force in women's football, as...

By Sofia Christensen, Diadie Ba and Ngouda Dione DAKAR (Reuters) -Fresh clashes broke out on Saturday between opposition supporters and

Dansby Swanson homered twice and drove in four runs, and the Chicago Cubs beat the crosstown White Sox 7-3 for their fourth consecutive victory

People with ties to the US and Canada have been caught up in the attack by Hamas. Here are their stories.

BEIJING China has rolled out a series of policy measures in recent months to revive a stumbling economy

TL;DR: As of July 29, get a lifetime subscription to KeepSolid SmartDNS for just $49.97

ZURICH Wealth manager Julius Baer's shares slumped another 5% on Tuesday, bringing its total decline since the start

New Zealand's Scott Dixon won a wild IndyCar season finale at Laguna Seca Raceway on Sunday as newly crowned series champion...

A funeral was held in Philadelphia for O’Shae Sibley, who was fatally stabbed after he confronted teenagers who taunted his group of gay, Black friends as they danced at a New York City gas station

The U.N. says the conflict in Sudan has driven more than 3 million people from their homes

The office of Special Counsel Jack Smith has argued in a motion that there’s “no valid basis” for Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself after Donald Trump’s legal team argued that she should leave the case because of statements she made when sentencing January 6 rioters. “There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding,” the special counsel’s office wrote in a 20-page filing on Thursday. “In service of his motion (ECF No. 50) seeking the Court’s recusal, the defendant both takes out of context the Court’s words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals.” The special counsel added that Mr Trump “has failed to identify anything approaching the clear and convincing evidence necessary to overcome the presumption of impartiality”. The office argued that Mr Trump was using “suggestion and innuendo to insinuate something sinister in the Court simply doing its job by addressing sentencing arguments”. More follows...

Charli D’Amelio revealed she stalks some of her ex-friends from her fake social media accounts